You shouldn’t have to look the other way when your broker has handled your investment with negligence. Your broker, an individual or firm, is supposed to act as a mediator between you as an investor and a securities exchange.  

After an investor discovers that their investment account has taken some hits at the behest of their broker, their next step of action is to go ahead with legal proceedings. That is the right way. You’d learn in this article how to go about your claim when you’re faced with a similar situation.  

What To Know Before Filing a Claim

Before proceeding with any legal procedures, filing a claim, or after exhausting all the possibilities with the firm involved in the disputation, the case would need to be estimated for validity. When evaluating, understand that losing money in an investment account is not an avenue for arbitration, whether it is a managed or brokerage account. 

Based on the volatility of investments and varying time horizons, investors are usually prone to experiencing loss in their investment at one time or the other. If the investor used legal assistance at this stage, the legal team is more likely still going to engage the expert witness in finding clues. It is the duty of the witness, an analyst with a background in accounting and finance, to discover hidden and obvious signs on the part of the broker. The signs include but are not limited to unsuitability, inability to monitor, churning, or negligence.

Being able to find evidence of at least one of these violations is crucial when trying to make a valid case. In other words, using an expert witness is essential in determining the recovery speed and putting out what’s known as the fact of damage.

Legal Proceedings

There are two ways you can decide about this: class-action or individual suits. Both have their individual advantages. If your pursuing the same claim alongside several others, a class action would be a good option. But, people with unique claims can opt for independent suits, giving them better control of the process.  

The challenge here is that persons can unknowingly exclude themselves by first filing for a class-action suit. Fortunately, the class-action papers have a clear way out to this type of issue by offering an opt-out for individuals with plans to pursue independent claims. As with every legal proceeding, the time frame needs to be within reasonable view considering courts usually have long wait-lists.

 The best approach to this kind of matter is to first have a strong legal team. A professionally trained and experienced legal staff brings depth to the case alongside added backing you can count on when seeking a settlement. If you’re able to select a good attorney and expert witness while the case is still young, you can change the trajectory of the proceedings at an early stage - Take Legal Action swiftly and, most importantly, ensure they are skilled securities, fraud lawyers. It is necessary for you to use an attorney that has a good track record and some experience in the securities industry.  

You can’t afford to play around here because, as you can imagine, the defending parties (broker or brokerage firm) will be well informed too. The market is usually fluctuating, so also are lawyers moving in and out of the securities-litigation niche. 

What Are The Basis For a Claim?

Most of the time, the common cases brought by securities fraud plaintiffs are usually law fraud or breach of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; the claimants go through one of two avenues; out-of-pocket losses or repealing the initial transaction as a solution. Any avenue typically leads to settlements. Let’s head on tho basis for a claim. 

Negligence

Negligence or failure to closely monitor do not usually count as a basis because of their lack of objective reality. However, they can make for a strong claim if proven. Most times, when there an allegation of negligence is proven, it is means a supervisor has failed at his responsibility to monitor their employees.

There is always a certain amount of control that needs to be in place for a negligence claim to hold. That is, if the broker oversaw quite a significant number of trades and were negligent in his execution or security selection, then there would be a basis for a claim.

Churning

Churning is another strong claim that is considered one of the easiest to prove. It means that the investor’s account was traded in excess amounts and calls for a certain level of control by the broker over the funds for it to be validated.

Financial advisers and brokerage institutions have a legal obligation to oversee the actions of their brokers’ recommendations to ensure they are obeying the rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, including federal and state securities laws. If a dealer cannot properly monitor a broker’s dealings, the organization can be held accountable for its inability to supervise.